Margaret Farren,
Email: Margaret.farren@dcu.ie
In 1995, Schön
advocated the need for a new epistemology of practice (Schön, 1995) and
suggested that this new scholarship would take the form of action research. A
new epistemology requires new living standards of judgment. Multimedia
explanations for educational influences in learning will be used to show how
e-media can be used to contribute to the creation of new living standards of
judgement of ‘pedagogies of the unique’
and ‘webs of betweenness’. Pedagogies of the unique involve systematic processes
of action and reflection. Webs of betweenness draw on ideas of Celtic
spirituality to emphasise a relational dynamic of the various contributions
from practitioner-researchers in which individuals recognise the humanity of
the other.
Introduction
For today’s teachers,
new technologies allow for new ways of doing things. E-media
hold out much promise.
With developments in bandwidth, learners can communicate different forms of
representation, in the form of multimedia. There is also the opportunity to
move beyond the walls of the classroom and opportunities for collaboration with
others. ICT is constantly shifting and developing and we can feel we are moving
and exploring unknown terrains. Early computers laboured over tasks that are
now done in nanoseconds.
The context of my
enquiry is the M.Sc E-Learning in Education and Training Management at
It is rare that the designer has the design all in her head
in advance, and then merely translates it. Most of the time, she is in a kind
of progressive relationship as she goes along, she is making judgements.
Sometimes, the designer’s judgements have the intimacy of a conversational
relationship. Where she is getting some response back from the medium, she is
seeing what is happening – what it is that she has created – and she is making
judgements about it at that level.
(Schön,
cited in Winograd, 1996: 176)
Practitioner-researchers
on the M.Sc. E-Learning programme bring their embodied knowledge and values
into the public domain through designing, developing and evaluating multimedia
and web based artefacts for use in their practice contexts.
In my practice-based research, I demonstrate how
I am contributing to a knowledge base of practice by creating my ‘living
educational theory’ (Whitehead, 1989, 2004). The accounts of learning that
constitute the living educational theories of practitioners refer to the use
and development of an action research methodology in which individuals express
their concerns when their values are not being lived as fully as possible. A
way forward is imagined in an action plan, data is gathered in the action and
evaluations made of the effectiveness of the actions in living the values more
fully. Concerns, plans and actions are modified in the light of the
evaluations. An account of the learning is produced that is submitted to a
validation group in order to strengthen the validity of the account and to
benefit from the ideas of others on ways in which the enquiry could move
forward.
This use of action research methodology is part of
a process of clarifying the meanings of the embodied values that form
explanatory principles in the account of learning. In the process of clarifying
the values in the course of their emergence in practice, they are transformed
into living epistemological standards of judgement that can be used to evaluate
the validity of the account of the learning. The purpose of the presentation is
to show how ontological values have been clarified in the course of their
emergence in practice and have been transformed into communicable standards of
judgement – this is fundamental to the creation of a new epistemology of
educational knowledge.
Theoretical
framework of pedagogies of the unique and webs of betweenness
Freire believes that
the openness of the dialogical educator to his or her own relearning gives
dialogue a democratic character. He believes that through dialogue, “we each
stimulate the other to think, and to re-think the former’s thoughts”.
Furthermore, he points out that “dialogue belongs to the nature of human
beings, as beings of communications” (Shor & Freire, 1987, p. 3). Shor contends that critical education has to
integrate the students and the teachers into a mutual creation and re-creation
of knowledge (ibid). To return from
Freire’s seminal insights to Barnett’s study of the present plight of higher
education, Barnett claims that professional life is now becoming more than the
handling of complexity i.e. managing overwhelming data and theories, it is also
about handling multiple frames of reference – a condition he calls
supercomplexity. Supercomplexity arises when we are faced with conflicting
frameworks with which to understand a situation. Barnett asserts that the main
pedagogical task of a university is not to transmit knowledge but to develop in
human beings the attributes appropriate to conditions of supercomplexity
(Barnett, 2000, p. 164). In order for
this to become a reality, he claims that a ‘higher education’ must embrace
three dimensions of being: knowledge, self-identity and action, in its
pedagogies. In other words, new modes of teaching have to be developed in
higher education. An educational requirement of supercomplexity is that the
student should have the space to develop her own voice. Barnett regrets that
lecturers often have an idea of teaching that puts the students in a
subservient position. The followers of such an approach see students as
recipients of a curriculum instead of largely choosing and/or making it
themselves (Barnett, 2000, p. 163). The main values inherent in the approaches
taken by those with a critical stance on the other hand are participation and
dialogue.
The ‘web of betweenness’ refers to how we learn in relation to one another and how e-media can enable us to get closer to the meanings of our embodied values as they emerge in practice (Farren, 2005a). The idea of individuality and originality enriching self and others highlights the uniqueness of the individual and the embrace and belonging to a community. O’ Donohue (2003) suggests that in the folk culture of the Celtic Imagination, experience was understood as being much more than the private product and property of an individual (O’ Donohue, 2003). O’ Donohue’s conviction that a ‘web of betweenness’ generated a collective bonus is reminiscent of the economists’ notion of ‘total factor productivity’ – the unexplained residual productivity created by a combination of favourable factors. His idea of community however extends beyond the social community to the idea of a community of spirit and relates more strongly to the educational values I discuss than the economists’ residuals: “The human self is not a finished thing, it is constantly unfolding” (O’ Donohue, 2003, p. 142). I seek to suggest that the communications rich characteristics of ICT can re-create in new forms the powerfully interactive traditional world whose passing O Donohue laments and justify applying O Donohue’s term.
Rigour
and validity in self-study research
For many years epistemology took the position
that any claim to know must be justified on the basis of how the claim was
arrived at. In many research fields, the
‘good grounds’ for judging the validity of knowledge claims was that the
researcher was ‘objective’, i.e. the researcher took an observer role, using
the methods of natural science. Research conducted along these lines entails an
epistemology heavily laden with positivist and empiricist notions. Scientific
method, so constructed, could be seen as the way to guarantee "true and
certain knowledge" (Usher, 1996, p. 26).
Usher’s reservations about what is often described as ‘scientific methods’ are echoed by Bertrand (1998, p. 117) who claims that knowledge comes first out of uncertainty or a question: “ Knowledge is the opposite of the demonstration of a rule and it has nothing to do with the bureaucratisation of ideas. It is an awareness, a sensitivity to life, to things that cannot be known, to uncertainty" (Bertrand, 1998, p. 117). He believes that we have to rely on our imagination, or we risk believing that textbooks, and the media, such as TV and movies show us real life. Sparkes (2002) is likewise concerned about the excessive claims made by adherents to the traditional view of scientific research with its commitment to rationality, objectivity, and a range of dualisms that include subject/other. Sparkes makes reference to the work of Schwandt who proposes that social inquiry be redefined through the application of practical philosophy, which involves challenging the ideology of ‘epistemic criteria’, that focuses on fixed and predetermined rules. In this way, he envisages a new moral and political framework would be invoked wherein values and concerns could be addressed through open dialogue, critical reflection, and a willingness to change (Schwandt, 1996).
I believe that ontology and epistemology are inextricably linked in self-study research. Research can be seen not as abstract but as involving interactions with others. As a higher education educator, I believe that my learners and I co-construct knowledge together, and this is a knowledge creation process. In exploring the different views of reality, I take the view that reality is constructed in collaboration with my students and that I construct meanings in relation to others. This has implications for the methodology of my research as I do not see knowledge as a fixed quantum but as an ongoing activity. In other words, social reality is constructed through interaction with others and so the observer’s exchanges with the observed, and the wider outcomes of these exchanges through these connections, represent a vital element in this form of research. Whitehead (2004) suggests that action research involves a self-study because the practitioner-researcher is studying his or her own practice. He does not believe that self-study necessarily involves action research. One can study the self without focusing on improving one’s practice. The emphasis in this enquiry is self-study within an action research approach.
A self-study must also answer the question of what makes it
valid. Feldman defines validity as the
“degree to which a study accurately reflects or assesses the specific topic
that the research is attempting” (Feldman, 2003, p. 26). In self-study we need to show that our
self-study as teacher educators is making a difference and bringing about
improvement in practice. This then raises the questions of how we know that we
have changed our ways of being and how we convince others not only that the
change has occurred but also that it has value (Feldman, 2003, p. 27). Qualitative research has few measurements and
researchers have developed other criteria to judge the validity of qualitative
research.
Feldman (2003) suggests the following ways to increase the
validity of self-studies:
i). Provide a clear and detailed description of
how we collect data and make explicit what counts as data in our work i.e. provide the details of the research
methods used.
ii). Provide clear and detailed descriptions of
how we constructed the representation for our data.
iii). Extend triangulation beyond multiple
sources of data to include explorations of multiple ways to represent the same
self-study.
iv). Provide evidence of the value of the changes in our ways of being teacher-educators.
Methods
In assessing the
quality of my practice based research, I focus on embodied values and living
standards of judgement that have emerged in the course of practice. These living standards of judgement include a
‘pedagogy of the unique’ and a ‘web of betweenness’. I provide evidence to show
my educational influence in my learning, in the learning of others, and in the
education of social formations through e-media accounts of learning. The methods used to validate my claims
include:
·
Living
educational theory action research cycles;
·
Winter’s six criteria of rigour;
·
Social
validation meetings.
Living educational theory
action research accounts of
learning methodology involve expressing concerns when educational values are
not lived in practice, imagining a way forward, gathering data, evaluating
practice on effectiveness of actions, modifying plans in light of the
evaluation.
Winter’s six criteria of rigour include dialectics, reflexivity, collaborative
resource, risk, plurality, theory, practice and transformation.
Habermas’s criteria of validity include four criteria of social validity, i.e.
comprehensibility, truth, rightness and authenticity.
Educational
and scientific importance of my work
The scientific importance of this research is in the use of an online learning environment, to support the development of web based artefacts and visual narratives using digital video. The facilitating potential of the online learning environment is demonstrated as participants explore the values that emerge in the course of their practice and for generating peer support. The educational significance of an action research approach is that validity is redefined in terms of the efficacy of the research in relation to changing relevant social practice (Sparkes, 2002).
Another
part of the educational significance is how e-media accounts are now validated
in the academy. From 2006,
practitioner-researchers on the M.Sc. E-Learning have a choice with regard to
the direction of their dissertation.
Choice One: Complete a traditional research-based 20,000
word dissertation on a relevant topic.
Choice Two: Complete a practicum which provides an
opportunity to apply new concepts and skills from the programme modules and
consequently reflect on individual learning. The completed practicum will consist of
any artifact (product) prepared (e.g. interactive software, online educational
resources or any artefact that uses electronic technology to support and enhance learning) and a
written report of not more than 10,000 words.
The use of technology
is embedded into the action research approach of the E-learning programme. Participants bring their experiences to the
programme for examination and discussion with their peers. This is done through use of the Moodle online
learning environment, e-media, such as web based artefacts and digital video.
This approach is designed to create a community of learners who are engaged in
developing their critical thinking and professional skills. It is this way that
participants can move back and forth between theory and practice, exploring
such concepts as "self as practitioner" and applying knowledge and
skills to practice settings. The use of the Moodle online learning environment
is essential for facilitating programme participants to explore their beliefs and
values related to practice and for generating peer support. These reflective
processes help deepen student understanding of the complex issues involved in
their individual area of study.
My
work has significant implications for national and international policy formation
and implementation, in terms of the reconceptualisation of educational theory
for developing international understanding through educational research. By
explaining how I encourage practitioners to set up and use their own on-line
learning environments, and produce their explanatory accounts of practice, I am
demonstrating the potentials of practitioner-based action research for
sustainable human practices that have deep implications for how social
interactions can be improved through the education of social formations with a
web of betweenness and a pedagogy of the unique (Farren, 2005b).
Conclusion
It is important for me
as a higher education educator to strive to articulate and live my educational
values and to give form and shape to them in my practice. In the presentation,
I intend to demonstrate how I have successfully achieved my goal of developing
the capacity of participants to be proactive in developing their
knowledge. In the context of my ‘pedagogy
of the unique’ these dialogic processes reflect my growing openness to learning
and relearning with others, and reveal that I believe that education should be
a democratic process that gives adequate “space to each participant to
contribute to the development of new knowledge, to develop their own voice, to
make their own offerings, insights, to engage in their own actions, as well as
to create their own products” (Barnett, 2000).
I offer new living
standards of judgement of a ‘pedagogy of the unique’ and a ‘web of betweenness’
for higher education. By this I see learning as relational and ICT as a way of
bringing us closer to the meanings of our embodied knowledge.
Bibliography
Barnett,
R. (2000) Realizing the University in an age of supercomplexity.
London, The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University
Press.
Bertrand, Y. (1998) The Ordinary Hero. Madison Wisconsin, Atwood Publishers.
Farren,
M. (2005a) How am I Creating my Pedagogy
of the Unique through a Web of Betweenness? Ph.D. Thesis, Bath, University of
Bath.
Farren, M. (2005b) How
can I support a web of betweenness through ICT? A paper presented at the EARLI
Conference SIG Invited symposium ‘Teaching and Teacher Education’, Nicosia,
August. Retrieved 20th
August 2006 from http://www.elearningeuropa.info/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=7020&doclng=6&menuzone=1
Feldman, A. (2003) Validity and Quality in
Self-Study. Educational Researcher,
32 (3), pp. 26-28.
Habermas, J. (1976) Communication and the evolution of society, London,
Heinemann.
O’Donohue, J. (2003) Divine Beauty: The Invisible Embrace. London, Transworld
Publishers.
Schön, D. (1995). ‘Knowing-in-action: The New
Scholarship requires a New
Epistemology.’ Change, November/December, 1995. pp. 27-34.
Schwandt, T. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2 (1), pp. 58-72.
Shor I. & Freire, P. (1987). A Pedagogy for Liberation. Dialogues on
Transforming Education. Mass: Bergin and Garvey.
Sparkes, A. C. (2002) Telling Tales in Sport and Physical Activity: A Qualitative Journey,
Leeds, Human Kinetics.
Usher, R. (1996) ‘A critique of the neglected
epistemological assumptions of
educational research’ in D. Scott & R. Usher (eds) Understanding
educational research. London: Routledge. pp. 9-32.
Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a Living
Educational Theory from Questions of the Kind, How do I improve my Practice? Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1):
41–52.
Whitehead, J. (2004). What counts as evidence in
self-studies of teacher-education practices: In Loughran, J., Hamilton, M.L.,
LaBoskey, V. K & Russell, T. L. eds. The
International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education
Practices. Dordrecht; Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Whitehead,
J. and McNiff, J. (2006) Action Research
Living Theory. London; Sage.
Winograd, T. (1996)
Bringing Design to Software. New York: ACM Press.
Winter, R. (1989) Learning
from Experience: Principles and Practices in Action
research. Falmer Press Ltd.
Zukas, M.
& Malcolm, J. (2002) Pedagogies for Lifelong Learning: Building Bridges or
Building Walls? Chapter 13 in Harrison, R., Reeve, F., Hanson, A. and Clark, J.
(2002) Supporting Lifelong Learning.
Volume 1: Perspectives on Learning. London, Routledge. pp 203-217.